On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Dmitry Buzdin <buz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Claus, > > Than I suggest the following tasks: > 1) try to use dozer osgi bundle instead of camel produced one and change > build scripts accordingly
Is the osgi bundle in a maven repo somewhere? And does it have a different artifact id? > 2) investigate on what it takes to integrate no-xml version of mappings Yeah providing the end user with this choice as well would be cool. > 3) when new release available propose closer integration scenario with Camel > DSL and Dozer DSL mixed (somewhere in June) Yeah Camel 2.3 is final now and we are about to build and release it. > 4) possibly wrap core dozer settings in camel module > > I could help from Dozer side, but it would be great is someone could test > our osgi bundle and further discuss no-xml approach. > Yeah post 2.3 release we can look into trying the osgi bundle in Felix Karaf. > Dmitry > > > Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >> >> Hi Dmitry >> >> Welcome to the Camel. >> >> >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Dmitry Buzdin <buz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I am current project lead of Dozer project. >> >> I am a Camel committer who is much involved with Camel. >> >> >>> Recently discovered Camel project and liked quite a lot. Noticed that you >>> have prepared integration module for dozer in recent releases. Therefore >>> I >>> would like to know if you have any issues related to Dozer or help needed >>> from our side. >>> >>> I noticed that there is only explicit mappings approach integrated, but >>> what >>> dozer is good for is automatic method matching without XML at all. This >>> is >>> not possible in Camel yet. Another thing is that we are going to >>> introduce >>> additional DSL like mapping API, this could be another point to add to >>> Camel >>> integration module. >>> >> >> Sounds like good features. Mapping without XML sounds really cool. >> Then its something more appealing to me as well :) >> We love contributions and having you helping out is a tremendous asset >> to bridge the worlds of Camel and Dozer. >> >> >>> We have osgi bundle released in parallel to simple jar build, I wonder if >>> you are interested in that as well. >>> >> >> Yes OSGi is really interesting as usually 3rd party .jars is not >> osgi'fied and then we need to >> do this ourself. >> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-470 >> >> >> >>> So generally speaking I would like to get in touch with person >>> responsible >>> for this module. >>> >> >> Its Stephen Gargan who contributed this component to Camel. This is the >> ticket: >> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2399 >> >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Dmitry >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/Dozer-Integration-tp28605575p28605575.html >>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Claus Ibsen >> Apache Camel Committer >> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ >> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com >> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Dozer-Integration-tp28605575p28606587.html > Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
