I dropped the current staged build and will redo the camel-2.3.0 release. I had mixed feelings about this one. For what is worth, you probably know a -1 does not necessarily mean that a release won't pass, it just mean it won't pass with a unanimous vote. In this particular case there was also a workaround available and the issue was quite isolated. The few examples missing from the build, and a couple of components made me change my vote (reluctantly) so I decided to redo it.
Camel as any apache project, is volunteer based, so a -1 also implies that you are willing to jump in and redo the release :). Cheers, Hadrian On May 21, 2010, at 3:05 AM, Martin Krasser wrote: > Hi guys, > > I see https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2738 as a must-have for > the release. Although, the issue status is marked as resolved for version 2.3 > there was a necessary second fix committed by William after the release > candidate (the fix was at revision 946605, see also the last post in this > thread > http://old.nabble.com/2.3-SNAPSHOT%3A-Stream-Caching-again-enabled-by-Bug-Fix-for-Camel-2686-and-CAMEL-2694-%28rev-941275%29--ts28582952.html). > So I have to give my -1 here. > > Sorry for coming up that late but I'm currently on vacation with only limited > internet/mail access. I'll try to be available for discussions (if necessary) > within the next few hours. > > Claus Ibsen schrieb: >> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just found there are three examples which pom version are still >>> 2.3-SNAPSHOT, in the Camel 2.3.0 tar.gz And these examples are not published >>> into staging repo too. >>> >>> It is caused by these examples is not included in the examples pom.xml, I >>> just committed a fix[1] for it. >>> >>> As these examples will not be compiled if the camel2.3-SNAPSHOT is removed. >>> I'm afraid we need to cut the camel 2.3.0 again. >>> >>> >> >> I dot NOT think this is such a problem that a new release has to be >> cut. We just add it to the knowns issue section of the 2.3 release >> notes. >> So I am still +1 on this release. >> >> >> >>> [1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=946888&view=rev >>> >>> Willem >>> >>> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >>> >>>> A new release apache-camel-2.3.0 is out with approximately 252 issues >>>> resolved: new features, improvements and bug fixes. >>>> >>>> Please find the staging repo here: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-005/ >>>> The tarballs are here >>>> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-005/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.3.0/ >>>> >>>> Please review and vote to approve this release binary. Your vote counts! >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.3.0 >>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) >>>> Vote is open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 >>>> >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >