The benefit if allowing developers to have their dsl that extends the camel dsl. I get asked this question now and then (last time yesterday). The only way to do it now is to have a separate dsl on top of the camel dsl. And the dsl is not that unified and you know it.
Hadrian On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:34 AM, James Strachan wrote: > On 18 October 2010 18:28, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: >> I changed the thread name to [discuss]. >> >> I like that idea and it's something we contemplated in the past. This will >> bring back the idea of getting the dsl out of core as well. > > What benefits does that have BTW? IMHO more dependencies for no actual > gain has negative value. > > FWIW early camel had Java DSL separate from the JAXB model and it was > a maintenance nightmare which is why we unified it into the same > model. > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/
