On 10 November 2010 15:00, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > That is true, but you can see your changes in the wiki right away. > > I love the idea of having the docs version controlled, I understand all the > benefits. I am also convinced losing the ability to edit in place is a major > community issue. Can we have both? We want to make it as easy as possible for > people to contribute. Documentation, as shown by the survey, is the #1 issue.
OK how about a compromise. All website & documentation goes into subversion, managed, branched & released by committers using the exact same processes as for code. Folks can then easily contribute to the code or docs using the same mechanism; patches & JIRAs. For folks who don't want to use svn, we have a 'user contributions' wiki where folks who sign the CLA can contribute & put new docs there. Over time we can then migrate their contributions back into the source control. -- James ------- FuseSource Email: ja...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: jstrachan Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration
