[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042852#comment-13042852
 ] 

Edstrom Johan commented on CAMEL-4022:
--------------------------------------

This is an interesting use-case....
I strongly agree that it is an edge-case, ideally I think this should be 
something that is done as try/catch/finally, but since the case can occur
from my looking at the test I agree that some sort of fatalError is at least a 
good start.

> Issue using errorBuilderRef with the xml dsl
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-4022
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4022
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Hadrian Zbarcea
>            Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea
>            Priority: Critical
>
> While fixing issues around the errorHandler I noticed that <onException> 
> definitions defined in the camel context are ignored if a route specifies its 
> own errorHandlerRef. The reason is that we set the onException definition on 
> the default error handler. I have a fix for that, but I discovered a 
> different issue (I think) for which I would like to discuss the solution.
> When we have an onException definition that looks kinda like this:
> {code}
> <onException>
>   <exception> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException</exception>
>   <to uri="mock:illegalArgumentException"/>
> </onException>
> {code}
> ... something happens, the IAE exception is caught, we do something, but in 
> that process another exception is thrown. Currently, that would be caught by 
> the default error handler, which may not be what we want.
> What error handler (if any) should handle exceptions thrown while in 
> onException?
> The onException mechanism is somewhat similar to a try/catch. I don't think 
> the exceptions thrown while handling onException should be handled by the 
> same error handler configured for the route, or even the context scoped one. 
> The processing should be very simple, predictable and immutable. Since the 
> default "CamelDefaultErrorHandlerBuilder" can be replaced, it is not imho a 
> solution and we need one global one that does as little as possible (the 
> problem would be agreeing what that is: no redeliveries, logging or not, etc).
> Thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to