+1 to a single source distro in a zip file.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me as well for single source.
> I also believe zip is better than tgz. This would avoid many Windows users
> assuming that a Windows version of the source distro doesn't exist imho.
>
> Hadrian
>
> On 06/23/2011 06:19 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
>>
>> +1 for a single source disto. Though maybe we could have a zip file
>> instead
>> of the tgz? Not sure if Windows can handle tgz OOTB.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Kettelerij<
>> richardkettele...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm fine with this, one source archive should be enough. Like Donald said
>>> most IDE's can handle both file types (although .zip is more common).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Claus Ibsen<claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to speed up the assembly part. That usually seems to take too long
>>>
>>> time
>>>>
>>>> :)
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if we need to build -javadoc JARs (if we do that) ?
>>>> Do people use them? Don't your IDE grab the javadoc from the -src JARs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>> -----------------
>>>> FuseSource
>>>> Email: cib...@fusesource.com
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
Principle Technical Writer
FuseSource
Phone: (781) 280-4174
E-Mail: emjohn...@fusesource.com
Blog: http://documentingit.blogspot.com/
Twitter: finnmccumial

Reply via email to