[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13078668#comment-13078668
]
Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on CAMEL-4301:
---------------------------------------------
I just tried and it's already the case. serviceClass could contain an interface
with the @WebService annotation.
I check the wiki page of camel-cxf and update it if required.
> cxfEndpoint serviceClass attribute should accept an interface or an anstract
> class
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-4301
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4301
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-cxf
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>
> If you define a route looking like:
> <cxf:cxfEndpoint id="wsBean"
> serviceClass="net.nanthrax.test.camel.cxf.WSBean"
> address="http://0.0.0.0:9090/test"/>
> <camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
> <route>
> <from uri="cxf:bean:wsBean"/>
> <to uri="direct:bean"/>
> </route>
> <route>
> <from uri="direct:bean"/>
> <to uri="serviceBean"/>
> </route>
> </camelContext>
> the methods of the CXF endpoint wsBean are just facade (the route doesn't use
> the implementation of the wsBean method, and map the method definition to the
> serviceBean target bean).
> It could be confusing for the users: they have to define methods body but
> it's not used :)
> It could be fine to use directly an interface or an abstract class in
> serviceClass.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
