[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13116268#comment-13116268
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-4468:
------------------------------------
I think ActiveMQ may use a naming of xxxMBean, so the interfaces could be named
ManagedRouteMBean and so forth.
> Providing Interfaces for MBeans to be able to proxy them
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-4468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4468
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 2.8.1
> Reporter: Marco Zapletal
> Priority: Trivial
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> This issue proposes to provide interfaces for the Camel JMX MBeans, which
> allows to (easily) proxy them on the client side (c.f.
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Providing-Interfaces-for-MBeans-to-be-able-to-proxy-them-td4813271.html#a4813298)
>
> I would provide the patch for this but before, I ask the core developers for
> code conventions in terms of the interfaces: In which package should the
> interfaces be put and how should they be named?
> Should they be put to the MBeans classes in org.apache.camel.management? But
> how to name them then, since for example IManagedRoute would break current
> camel naming conventions and identifiers such as ManagedRoute are already
> taken by the class implementations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
