Agree, there's no value in it anymore and for those looking at older
versions they'll look at the archives page anyway. I'd say go for it.
Hadrian
On 10/26/2011 12:20 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
I'm wondering whether we should still mention the Camel version 1.6.4 on our
download site [1]. This version was released in Dec 2010 and is not
supported anymore.
Shouldn't we mention/list the availability of Camel 2.7.4 instead, because
it's still in maintenance?
[1] http://camel.apache.org/download.html
Best,
Christian
