[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13149281#comment-13149281
]
Babak Vahdat edited comment on CAMEL-4668 at 11/13/11 12:11 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
@Prebsen,
thanks for you comment, but the patch you attached reveals exactly the same
behaviour as my attached patch also does, as you added the following assertion:
{code}
List<?> foundSendEmails = jpaTemplate.find(SELECT_ALL_STRING);
assertTrue("Expect table 3 elements in SendEmail, was: " +
foundSendEmails.size(), foundSendEmails.size() == 3);
{code}
And this is *exactly* what I do *NOT* expect. Apparently according to what
Claus said, the transaction should have been *rollbacked*. So after the routing
of those 3 payloads completes the transaction through the spring's
JpaTransactionManager should have been *rollbacked*, *but it's NOT*, as
there're three rows on that table having the addresses 'f...@beer.org',
'b...@beer.org', and 'kab...@beer.org'.
Maybe it's because of my poor english why I don't get the point. Anyone
available who could explain it to me in german, or may be even better in my
mother tongue persian :-)
Thanks anyway.
was (Author: bvahdat):
@Prebsen,
thanks for you comment, but the patch you attached reveals exactly the same
behaviour as my attached patch also does, as you added the following assertion:
{code}
List<?> foundSendEmails = jpaTemplate.find(SELECT_ALL_STRING);
assertTrue("Expect table 3 elements in SendEmail, was: " +
foundSendEmails.size(), foundSendEmails.size() == 3);
{code}
And this is *exactly* what I do *NOT* expect. Apparently according to what
Claus said, the transaction has been already *rollbacked*. So after the routing
completes the transaction through the spring's JpaTransactionManager should
have been *rollbacked*, *but it's NOT*, as there're three rows on that table
having the addresses 'f...@beer.org', 'b...@beer.org', and 'kab...@beer.org'.
Maybe it's because of my poor english why I don't get the point. Anyone
available who could explain it to me in german, or may be even better in my
mother tongue persian :-)
Thanks anyway.
> JpaConsumer - Should rollback if processing of an exchange failed
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-4668
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4668
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-jpa
> Affects Versions: 2.7.4, 2.8.2
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.7.5, 2.8.3, 2.9.0
>
> Attachments: JpaTXRollbackTest.patch, JpaTXRollbackTest2.patch
>
>
> If a JPA consumer pickup X messages and then one of those messages fails to
> be processed and throws an exception, then the JPA consumer should detect
> this and mark the TX as rollback.
> Currently there is a flaw which causes the JPA consumer to commit the batch.
> See nabble
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Misleading-jmx-statistics-on-jpa-component-tp4960503p4960503.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
