Yeah, good idea. I've made this change.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jon Anstey <jans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI took another look at this and it is not a real issue. When using
> async
> > sends in ActiveMQ on the producer side we can't really guarantee the
> order
> > in which messages will be added to the queue. To gaurantee order we can
> > either enable sync sends, persistent messages, or transactions (all boil
> > down to sync sends...). I made a fix for the test here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1202227
> >
>
> Great. I wonder if we should just add logic to the BaseJmsTest class
> (or watever its called) to enable sync send by default?
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Jon Anstey <jans...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Was looking into this on Friday but didn't solve it. I'll have another
> >> look today but if someone is really interesting in digging in ActiveMQ
> ;)
> >> the hint is that it works when you disable async sends.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Christian,
> >>>
> >>> I guess it depends of the JMS connection pool configuration (and the
> >>> message retention/timeout).
> >>>
> >>> I will try to take a look later today from the airport.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/13/2011 12:36 AM, Christian Müller wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm a bit surprising about this failed unit test [1]. It looks like on
> >>>> slow
> >>>> boxes like the Jenkins server and Jon's Laptop ( sorry for that ;-) )
> the
> >>>> messages arrived out of order or we loose one. Is this (a known)
> issue in
> >>>> ActiveMQ? Because this test run very well on my machine, I cannot dig
> >>>> deeper in this issue...
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/**Camel.trunk.fulltest/553/org.**
> >>>>
> apache.camel$camel-jms/**testReport/org.apache.camel.**component.jms/**
> >>>> JmsSelectorInTest/**testJmsSelectorIn/<
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.fulltest/553/org.apache.camel$camel-jms/testReport/org.apache.camel.component.jms/JmsSelectorInTest/testJmsSelectorIn/
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Christian
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>> jbono...@apache.org
> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jon
> >> ---------------
> >> FuseSource
> >> Email: j...@fusesource.com
> >> Web: fusesource.com
> >> Twitter: jon_anstey
> >> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Jon
> > ---------------
> > FuseSource
> > Email: j...@fusesource.com
> > Web: fusesource.com
> > Twitter: jon_anstey
> > Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> > Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> FuseSource
> Email: cib...@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Jon
---------------
FuseSource
Email: j...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: jon_anstey
Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen

Reply via email to