The current syslog is using an outdated RFC 3164.  Since, I'm in need of a
syslog RFC 5424 component I've created one that current wraps syslog4j for
the marshalling, the rest I can pretty much copy and extend the existing
syslog implementation. 

Questions
1) I'm open to contributing this, do you guys want this if it uses syslog4j
under the covers?
2) If so, what should it be called? syslog2?
 
Cheers,
Martin


--
View this message in context: 
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/syslog-RFC-5424-dataformat-component-tp5015386p5015386.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to