If we rename http4 to http for camel 3.0 I think it is acceptable as it
is a major version.
On the other hand if we do not do it then what would we do? Keep http4
forever and not have http. For new users this will look just weird.
Christian
Am 09.04.2012 22:04, schrieb Christian Müller:
My 0,02 $:
I would add a warning on page [1] that new user should prefer to use
camel-http4 over camel-http (as we did it already for iBatis). Camel-http
should mark as deprecated and will be deleted in Camel 3.x.
I would *NOT* rename camel-http to camel-http3 and camel-http4 to
camel-http. This will confuse our users.
[1] http://camel.apache.org/http.html
Best,
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
