-1, as it's working for a long time and stable.
We may discuss this change or rename the URI to a more appropriate
name for Camel 3.x, but we should keep it as is for Camel 2.x line
Freeman
On 2012-6-20, at 上午8:37, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Using URIs to identify and configure Endpoints is a notable Apache
Camel innovation. This feature was present in Camel from its first
release. The definition of the URIs syntax in unambiguous and
defined in RFC-2396 [1].
Some components introduced along the way do not use valid URIs and
this needs to be corrected. This vote is intended to formalize the
apparent lazy consensus in the [discuss] thread [2] on the dev@
list. This vote reflects agreement with the principle only. If this
vote passes the details of the solution will be fleshed out later.
[ ] +1 Camel MUST use valid URIs for Endpoint configuration
[ ] -1 Camel does not need to use valid URIs (please provide reason).
Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
--
Hadrian Zbarcea
Principal Software Architect
Talend, Inc
http://coders.talend.com/
http://camelbot.blogspot.com/
[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/camel-dev/201206.mbox/%3C4FD60168.5090009%40gmail.com%3E
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
