+1, end user should have the right to decide which kind of license he
will use.
But I'm not sure if it is right for us to remove the ASL from the
source code of camel maven archetype.
On Wed Jul 4 14:33:38 2012, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
When end users of Camel uses the Camel Maven Archetypes to create new projects
http://camel.apache.org/camel-maven-archetypes.html
Then we generate a new skeleton Maven project for them.
Currently these *generated* source files contains ASF license headers.
I want to discuss if we should remove these ASF headers from the
*generated* files.
Our end users works in organization that build software, and they may
not use any license headers,
or use their own license headers, or use another kind of header.
I think we should not include any license headers at all, and leave it
for the end users to decide for that.
Any thoughts?
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: willemjiang