Very well done! Kudos :-) Babak
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote > > Hi > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:52 AM, aedwards <adam@> wrote: >> http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?128152-Spring-Integration-2-1-request-reply-benchmark-tests-showed-very-poor-performance >> > > A memory leak has been discovered in the AMQ 5.6.0 connection pool > (activemq-pool). This is why the above test could not complete using > the AMQ pooling. But could complete with the Spring based pooling > instead. > > I have tracked down the leak and logged a ticket in AMQ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3997 > > With a fix in place, the test can complete with activemq-pool without > any memory leaks or issues. > The performance numbers is on par with the spring based pooling. > > > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/fyi-SI-tp5716049.html >> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > FuseSource > Email: cibsen@ > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/fyi-SI-tp5716049p5718191.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
