On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Christian Müller <christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to use the groupId org.apache-extras.camel-extra > +1 to use the package name org.apachextras.camel.xxx >
+1 Yeah that sounds fine. > Best, > Christian > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Summarizing: >> > +1 for camel-example-esper as artifactId >> > +1 for renaming groupId in whole camel-extra to org.apache-extras.camel >> > +1 for using the same groupId for esper example >> > >> > Anybody wants to change anything in the three points above? >> >> I won't proceed with Camel-Extra 2.10.0 release until I got some +1s >> for the above points. The most important point above is "renaming >> groupId in whole camel-extra to org.apache-extras.camel". Do you (PMCs >> in particular) agree with me regarding points above? :) >> >> When we settle the agreement on these points, I'll perform the release. >> >> -- >> Henryk Konsek >> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com >> > > > > -- -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
