+1 Sent from a mobile device Am 06.11.2012 13:48 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" <claus.ib...@gmail.com>:
> Hi > > In the binary distro of Apache Camel we have in the lib directory a > number of 3rd party JARs > > lib/slf4j-api-1.6.6.jar > > lib/optional/ > commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar > geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.1.jar > commons-collections-3.2.1.jar > geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar > commons-dbcp-1.4.jar jasypt-1.9.0.jar > commons-lang-2.6.jar log4j-1.2.17.jar > commons-pool-1.6.jar slf4j-log4j12-1.6.6.jar > geronimo-j2ee-jacc_1.0_spec-1.1.jar > > lib/spring/ > aopalliance-1.0.jar > spring-expression-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > commons-logging-1.1.1.jar > spring-jdbc-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-aop-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-jms-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-asm-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-orm-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-beans-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-test-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-context-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar spring-tx-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-context-support-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-web-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > spring-core-3.0.7.RELEASE.jar > > > I think we should stop including these JARs as they are not needed. > They were included back in the days when some of the examples could be > run from ANT, which would refer to these JARs to run. > But all the examples is Maven based now. And all needed JARs is > downloaded on-the-fly. > > So maybe we should restructure the lib directory? > > This will also cut down on the size of the distribution and make Camel > seems even more light-weight. > > Any thoughts? > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > Email: cib...@redhat.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >
