Hi Thanks for the patch. As you know we can only apply the patch which is granted with ASL. Please fill a JIRA[1] and submit the patch (the patch will be granted with ASL by default), then we can put it into the camel svn repository.
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.javaeye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: willemjiang On Monday, November 26, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Sotaro Kimura wrote: > Hi, all. > > I'm testing hbase client using camel-hbase component. > But in this test, data put performance is low. > ( about 20 put operation / second, I use Core i7 2700K machine.) > > I confirmed performance bottleneck. > And I find bottleneck below > > - Everytime camel-hbase component put data, > camel-hbase component creates and closes HTableInterface. > - But HTableInterface create cost is high. > So camel-hbase component performance is low. > > I modified HBaseProducer using HTablePool, > data put performance is improved 20 operetion/second to 200 operation/second. > > Modified source is below( and attach patchfile.txt) > -HBaseProducer.java(orig) > ---------------------------- > 103 } finally { > 104 table.close(); > 105 } > ---------------------------- > > -HBaseProducer.java(improved) > ---------------------------- > 103 } finally { > 104 tablePool.putTable(table); > 105 } > ---------------------------- > > What should I do for contribution it. > > regards. > > -- > ################################# > Sotaro Kimura > <rfbrin...@gmail.com (mailto:rfbrin...@gmail.com)> > ################################# > > > Attachments: > - patchfile.txt >
