+1 for a new component. In Camel 3.0 we try to stream line camel-core as much as possible.
Sent from a mobile device Am 13.02.2013 19:54 schrieb "Daniel Gredler" <[email protected]>: > Ah, OK. I've uploaded a third patch that adds the DSL elements but keeps > everything in camel-core. I'll wait for the outcome of the "camel-core > vs new component" discussion before making any other changes. > > Take care, > > Daniel > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Henryk Konsek [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:44 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Support for zip (de)compression > > > Yep, I can probably do that today or tomorrow. > > Great to hear that. > > > Wouldn't it need to be part of camel-core in order to have DSL > elements? > > The component code can be in separated module, while DSL definition > only will stay in camel-core (org.apache.camel.model.dataformat > package). DSL builders can create DataFormat instance without explicit > reference to the concrete implementation. > > -- > Henryk Konsek > http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com >
