> The quality would be in the responsibility of the owner.

Code ownership doesn't play well with the quality of the open source
code. Let's face it - the components without the organized care from
the committers team will be lousy. The existing components released
from the ASF umbrella will degrade over the time. For a long run they
won't work as well as they do now.

My proposal for frequent components releases is one thing. But
dropping support for components is just another. For me proposition of
holding the community support for components and delegating it to
component owners, is downgrading to project to the rank of Spring
Integration. I believe that users will not be interested in the
marketplace of crappy and unstable components. Many users will prefer
to choose SI then because of the Spring name. Without our army of
components Camel won't be so unique anymore.

--
Henryk Konsek
http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com

Reply via email to