Hello Henryk,

please find my comments inline.

Best,
Christian

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > +1 I like this proposal.
>
> I'll create the GitHub organization called 'camel-marketplace'. Then
> I'll create 'camel-scala' and 'camel-scala-extra' projects under its
> umbrella. If anybody of you want to be added as an administrator to
> the 'camel-marketplace' organization, please just drop me a line.
>
> All the contributions to the 'camel-scala' will be released under
> Apache license. Contributions under incompatible licenses will be
> committed to 'camel-scala-extra'.
>
I would be lazy. Only create the "camel-scala-extra" project if needed...

>
> After I create the projects together with some nice homepages for
> them, I'll add appropriate references to the Camel Contributing [1]
> and Camel Components [1] pages. From this point forward we could refer
> to these projects as to the official home for the Camel components
> written in Scala.
>
Be careful. What do you mean with "the official home for the Camel
components written in Scala"?
This is not an ASF project! There are may Apache (Camel) committers who
also will work in this project. And this project is related to an Apache
project because it provides some "extensions" for it. But nothing more.
It's ok to add it to the Camel Components page. But it's not ok to put it
on the Camel Contributing page for the reason I mentioned before.


>
> The versioning and the life cycle of Scala communities will be
> synchronized with ASF Camel release the same way as Camel Extra is.
>
Bit of work but sounds good.

>
> What do you think?
>
> [1] http://camel.apache.org/contributing.html
> [2] http://camel.apache.org/components.html
>
> --
> Henryk Konsek
> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
>



--

Reply via email to