Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-) In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can remember...).
It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of them. But what's with our sandbox project/module? Do we have to move it into trunk? [1] http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-force-switching-from-SVN-to-GIT-td5715773.html [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/scripts/ [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/website/ [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/sandbox/ [5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ [6] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/ide/ Best, Christian On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice. > > Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as > much as I dislike bringing that on this list, well, I did it for lack of a > better forum. > > [1] http://code.google.com/a/**apache-extras.org/p/camel-** > extra/issues/detail?id=38<http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/issues/detail?id=38> > > -- > Hadrian Zbarcea > Principal Software Architect > Talend, Inc > http://coders.talend.com/ > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ >
