It was easier than I expect. Karaf do the "hard work" and provide the
features we depend on ;-)

Best,
Christian


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Babak Vahdat
<babak.vah...@swissonline.ch>wrote:

>
> Just arrived @ home and saw your answer...
>
> Yeah exactly, the problem is that all those OSGi friendly Spring JARS in
> 3.2.x have NOW the artifactId "org.springframework.XYZ" instead of just
> "XYZ". This would need a huge change in the dependency chain of our Maven
> build as well as Karaf features. I'm curious to see if we could really
> support BOTH Spring 3.1.x & 3.2.x at the SAME time out-of-the-box.
>
> We would also need to make use of Spring EBR by the parent or the root POM:
>
> http://ebr.springsource.com/repository/app/faq#q8
>
> BTW looking at the following article it seems I'm not the only one having
> "doubt" about OSGi craft:
>
> http://www.infoq.com/news/2012/10/spring-osgi-gradle
>
> Babak
>
>
> Am 14.05.13 20:48 schrieb "Christian Müller" unter
> <christian.muel...@gmail.com>:
>
> >Thanks Babak for pointing this out!
> >
> >The difference is:
> >Spring 3.1:
> >mvn:org.springframework/core/3.1.x <- OSGI bundle
> >
> >Spring 3.2:
> >mvn:org.springframework/core/3.2.x <- normal JAR file
> >mvn:org.springframework/org.springframework.core/3.2.x <- OSGI bundle
> >
> >Bad...
> >
> >The Spring 3.2 OSGI bundles are only available in the Spring EBR at [1]
> >
> >Bad again...
> >
> >This makes it really complicated to provide a feature file for Spring 3.1
> >and 3.2. I will work on this now. The first goal is to get it working with
> >Spring 3.2. Afterwards I will check what we can do to support Spring 3.1
> >as
> >well.
> >
> >[1] http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release
> >
> >Best,
> >Christian
> >
> >
> >On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Babak Vahdat
> ><babak.vah...@swissonline.ch>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Just wonder if the current Karaf 2.3.x SVN code base really supports
> >>Spring
> >> 3.2.x as it's no longer OSGi complaint. This is also why currently our
> >> Karaf
> >> features validation on trunk is failing:
> >>
> >> ~/dev/workspace/camel/platforms>mvn clean install -Pvalidate
> >> Š
> >> ...
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> org.apache.karaf.tooling:features-maven-plugin:2.3.1:validate
> >>(validate) on
> >> project apache-camel: Unable to validate
> >>
> >>
> >>/Users/bvahdat/dev/workspace/camel/platforms/karaf/features/target/classe
> >>s/features.xml:
> >> mvn:org.springframework/spring-context/3.2.2.RELEASE is not an OSGi
> >>bundle
> >> -> [Help 1]
> >> [ERROR]
> >> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> >>the -e
> >> switch.
> >> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >> [ERROR]
> >> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> >> please
> >> read the following articles:
> >> [ERROR] [Help 1]
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
> >> [ERROR]
> >> [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
> >> command
> >> [ERROR]   mvn <goals> -rf :apache-camel
> >>
> >> I assume if we would properly switch our Maven build to SpringSource EBR
> >> then the problem should be fixed, for more details see:
> >>
> >>    http://www.springsource.org/springframework-ebr
> >>
> >> I also checked the the Karaf 2.3.x branch code base and couldn't find
> >>any
> >> usage of SpringSource EBR but maybe I missed something.
> >>
> >> Babak
> >>
> >> Christian Mueller wrote
> >> > JB added the Spring 3.2 support to Karaf 2.3.x today [1].
> >> > I will go ahead and make Spring 3.2 as the default and set up a Spring
> >> 3.1
> >> > CI build as well.
> >> >
> >> > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1481748
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> > Christian
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Claus Ibsen &lt;
> >>
> >> > claus.ibsen@
> >>
> >> > &gt; wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah I think it would be good to upgrade to Spring 3.2.x for Camel
> >>2.12.
> >> >> Certainly if Karaf / SMX will support that version as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Christian Müller
> >> >> &lt;
> >>
> >> > christian.mueller@
> >>
> >> > &gt; wrote:
> >> >> > I'm wondering whether we should use Spring 3.2.2.RELEASE by default
> >> for
> >> >> > Camel 2.12.x.
> >> >> > This version is stable and by still supporting Spring 3.1.x (with a
> >> >> > separate CI build), we can make sure Camel 2.12.x is working with
> >> Karaf
> >> >> > 2.3.1.
> >> >> > Starting with Karaf 2.3.2, Karaf comes with a Spring 3.2 feature
> >>[1].
> >> >> Karaf
> >> >> > 2.3.2 is expected for  the next two/three weeks [2].
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What do you think?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2062
> >> >> > [2]
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Apache-Karaf-2-3-2-and-3-0-0
> >>-RC2-in-two-weeks-time-td4028632.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Best,
> >> >> > Christian
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Claus Ibsen
> >> >> -----------------
> >> >> www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.
> >> >>
> >> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >> >> Email:
> >>
> >> > cibsen@
> >>
> >> >> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >> >> Twitter: davsclaus
> >> >> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> >> >> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> >>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Upgrade-Spring-3-1-4-RELEASE-3-2-2-RELE
> >>ASE-tp5732377p5732494.html
> >> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
>
>
>

Reply via email to