Am 21.05.13 14:17 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" unter <claus.ib...@gmail.com>:

>Hi
>
>Okay so we got some good headway now.
>
>The sample use case on 2.11 has a stacktrace of about 40 lines (without
>JMX).
>And on trunk we are down to 17 now (without JMX) and +2 if JMX enabled.
>
>That is reducing the stack traces with by 3 fold in that given sample.

Hi Claus

This's just awesome. Thanks!

Babak


>
>
>
>On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I added some tasks as comments on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6377#comment-13661858
>>
>> The goal of CAMEL-6377 is to do *internal* optimiztion changes only
>> with the goal of minimazing the stack-frames in use, as well reduce
>> the long stacktraces our end users see. And also for the end users who
>> go down the path of debugging the Camel routing, then there is less
>> "callback hell".
>>
>> As Raul said we have ideas sketched for Camel 3.0, where we can do
>> bigger changes, and as well do some API changes (if it makes
>> value/sense) etc. And the ideas that Raul refers to is much bigger and
>> takes a lot longer to implement. And possible some prototype is
>> needed. And also care has to be taken as we have DSL in Scala / Groovy
>> / Kotlin etc. that may be affected. And also a large user base on 2.x
>> API that relies on this being stable etc.
>>
>> However as in CAMEL-6377 with fairly little effort (half a friday +
>> half a day on weekend + half toda) + the effort for the remainder
>> tasks (eg the comment on the JIRA) we could get this implemented
>> fairly soon.
>>
>> Its IMHO important to keep the scope on the goals of "reducing
>> stack-frames, less long stacktraces, and easier debugging). All the
>> stuff about iterative routing engine etc, is also what is captured on
>> the Camel 3.0 ideas page, and also sketched in more details by Raul
>> with his idea of "decision" being returned from the processor(s). But
>> that is IMHO not the current scope of CAMEL-6377. The scope is to be
>> internal optimizations on the current 2.x architecture.
>>
>> If people wanna help with CAMEL-6377, then check the JIRA ticket and
>> the list of bulleted tasks.
>>
>> The code changes is about to be committed later this afternoon. Just
>> running one extra fully sanity unit tests of the entire code base, to
>> ensure no regressions or other gremlins introduced. Including all the
>> OSGi tests which you need to run specially.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com>
>>wrote:
>>> Hi Claus,
>>>
>>> It's great that you're finding time for this. The need to lighten
>>> stacktraces was already brought up within the Camel 3.0 context [1]. In
>>> fact, there's also an entry in the roadmap page [2] which proposes
>>>moving
>>> away from the recursive model into an iterative routing engine.
>>>
>>> It's clear that the next step in that area is a prototype. I hope I can
>>> start working on that soon, even though the whole Camel 3.0
>>>conversation
>>> seems to have cooled down at present.
>>>
>>> Anyway, do you have a concrete work plan or list of processors you'd
>>>are
>>> targeting with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6377?
>>>
>>> If so, could you create a few individual JIRA tasks? I'd happily take
>>>on
>>> some of the simplification/rationalisation work!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> 
>>>http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Camel-3-0-Core-of-the-routing-
>>>engine-td5727754.html
>>> [2] http://camel.apache.org/camel-30-ideas.html
>>>
>>> *Raúl Kripalani*
>>> Enterprise Architect, Open Source Integration specialist, Program
>>> Manager | Apache
>>> Camel Committer
>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>>http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Just to tell about the work I am currently doing
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6377
>>>>
>>>> We have room to optimize the routing engine in Camel to make it more
>>>> friendlier to end users in terms of
>>>> - reduced stacktraces
>>>> - faster and easier to debug the code if you single step through all
>>>> the routing engine logic
>>>> - potential optimization to skip over functionality that is turned off
>>>> (eg such as tracer etc)
>>>> - potential optimization to add new cross cutting functionality at
>>>> runtime (though not currently the primary goal)
>>>> - potential to skip using RedeliveryErrorHandler/DefaultErrorHandler
>>>> if end user have not configured to use any kind of redelivery (the
>>>> reason is that logic in this guy is excessive and is harder for people
>>>> to debug)
>>>> - reduce wrapping internal processors when not needed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is a sample route in the ticket where a stacktrace is forced
>>>> being thrown. And the difference is 40 vs 28 lines in the stacktrace.
>>>> And there is room for further optimization.
>>>>
>>>> The work is aimed at being non invasive on the current architecture
>>>> and also backwards compatible. So far I have noticed a problem with
>>>> the old behavior I have logged as:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6378
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>> -----------------
>>>> www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.
>>>>
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> Email: cib...@redhat.com
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Twitter: davsclaus
>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.
>>
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> Email: cib...@redhat.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>
>
>
>-- 
>Claus Ibsen
>-----------------
>www.camelone.org: The open source integration conference.
>
>Red Hat, Inc.
>FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>Email: cib...@redhat.com
>Web: http://fusesource.com
>Twitter: davsclaus
>Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen


Reply via email to