Hi guys,
I'm just wondering if there are any technical reasons why a RouteDefinition
is allowed zero to unbounded occurrences of the `from` element;
>From the Schema for camel 2.10.0 -
<xs:complexType name="routeDefinition">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="tns:processorDefinition">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="tns:from" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
......
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
......
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
We can see from the generated Schema that we are allowed a route that looks
like the following :
<route>
<log message="Hello World" />
</route>
But we will receive the following error if we try to run it
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Route has no inputs: Route[[] ->
[Log[hello World]]]
IE, can we add a required = true annotation to force a min-occurs = 1 in the
generated schema, or are there technical reasons why this isn't a good idea?
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Xml-schema-RouteDefinition-tp5735010.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
