Please us the user mailing list for further questions like this as we say here [1].
Yes, we have a camel-mail component [2] [3]. Valid uri schemas for this component are imap, imaps, nntp, pop3, pop3s, smtp and smtps [4]. You are right, it's misleading to use "mail://..." at [2]. I will go and fix this... [1] http://camel.apache.org/mailing-lists.html [2] http://camel.apache.org/components.html [3] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tree;f=components/camel-mail;h=f24c9f8de64466212f7d4b6fbac9b2565ffddba8;hb=HEAD [4] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tree;f=components/camel-mail/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/org/apache/camel/component;h=93dcec20aeb9df48e65ee24c30adb2263659d3af;hb=HEAD Best, Christian ----------------- Software Integration Specialist Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:13 AM, gliesian <rob...@gliesian.com> wrote: > Does a "mail:" component exist? > > Or is it just the three "imap:", "smtp:" and "pop3:"? > > If it is just the three... then the online and user manual documentation is > misleading. > > "mail:" should 'not' be referenced as a valid scheme/component, if it > truely > does not exist. > > Of if it does exist... then explanation as how to use the specific "mail:" > component should be provided (which it is not). > > Either way, the documentation needs to be updated... thank you. > > Thanks, > Robert > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/mail-component-does-not-exist-tp5738864.html > Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
