Hi,

I’m not sure if we use LGPLv3 jar inside of Apache Camel, but we have 
camel-extra[1] to host the components which may not be hosted Apache Camel 
repository due to license issue.

[1]https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/?redir=1

--  
Willem Jiang

Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang  
Weibo: 姜宁willem



On December 17, 2014 at 12:07:14 AM, Andrea Cosentino 
(ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm currently working on a new component: camel-cassandra.
> This component will use: - Datastax Java Driver (Apache License 2.0)
> and for unit testing - Cassandra-Unit
> My doubt is related to this last project. This work is licensed under LGPL V 
> 3.0 and should  
> be very useful to have an embedded cassandra instance in the camel component 
> test classes.  
> Is LGPL V 3.0 compatible with Apache License 2.0? From the GPL Compatibility 
> on apache.org  
> I'd say yes. Anyway I prefer to have an answer from the community.
> The datastax java driver use the following compressor: LZ4Compressor, 
> SnappyCompressor  
> and DeflateCompressor as documentation reports.
> Anyway this compressors use different licenses: LZ4Compressor have a new BSD 
> license,  
> while Snappy compressor use Apache License 2.0. At this moment I'm not 
> including these  
> libraries in the pom.xml, the only evidence of this is a Warning. Do you have 
> any ideas  
> on how to manage this situation?
> Thanks a lot,Bye,Andrea Cosentino
>  

Reply via email to