Hi Claus,
yes. The idea is to keep the jetty name. People then of course can only
install one of the impls.
As camel-jetty8 and camel-jetty9 require different versions of jetty
this should be no problem as it would not be possible to run both anyway.
Christian
Am 17.01.2015 um 11:38 schrieb Claus Ibsen:
Hi
Good work Christian. Its unfortunately a lot of hard work to support
Jetty, as they keep changing and breaking their APIs and whatnot.
I assume you keep the component name as jetty for both of them, and
the idea is that you only use one, either jetty8 or jetty9?
Otherwise we would likely need to name one of them jetty8 or jett9 by
default, to avoid the clash.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
I have prepared the split of camel-jetty for jetty 8 and 9 ready on branch
temp-jetty9-2.
I removed camel-jetty and created three new modules camel-jetty-common,
camel-jetty8 and camel-jetty9.
The unit tests are located in camel-jetty9. For camel-jetty8 I set the test
source to the other module so the same tests run for camel-jetty8.
Currently the karaf feature integration is the major thing missing. One
remaining question there is if we want to embed camel-jetty-common or leave
it as a separate bundle.
Please review the changes.
If there is no negative feedback I will commit to master on next monday
after adding the karaf feature integration.
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
http://www.talend.com
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
