Wasn't there a camel update from 1.6 to 1.7 in the 2.x series? On 28 January 2016 at 10:12, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Major version X (X.y.z | X > 0) MUST be incremented if any backwards > > incompatible changes are introduced to the public API. > > > > http://semver.org/#spec-item-8 > > > > If it did, there is no question that we must bump up to 3.0.0. But as we > > stand, bumping up to 3.0.0 is optional and based on individual opinions > and > > feelings. > > > > @Daniel – did you have the same discussion in the CXF lists? (you stayed > on > > the 3.x track). > > Right. CXF 3.0.x supports Java 6. 3.1.x is java 7/8. 3.2.x will be > Java8 only. > > Also note that we already did the same thing with Camel, twice. We > supported Java 6 up to 2.14.0. We dropped support for Java 6 and went > Java7+ in 2.15. Camel 2.6 supported Java5, but we dropped that in Camel > 2.7 and went Java6+. > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
