No problem from my side.

In my opinion we can remove them.

Thanks!
 --
Andrea Cosentino 
----------------------------------
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd



On Monday, April 4, 2016 1:57 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

Could any Camel committer take a look at that list.

If nothing is heard by next week we will start delete them.

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Gregor Zurowski
<gre...@list.zurowski.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> It would be nice to remove these branches, including trunk and master-dev.
>
> Thanks,
> Gregor
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We got a bunch of remote branches that has been merged to master, or
>> is no longer in use.
>>
>> I propose to remove all branches that are not camel release branches
>> or master itself. And the old trunk branch (should it be kept?)
>>
>> These are the ones:
>>
>>  origin/CAMEL-4232
>>  origin/CAMEL-6555
>>   origin/camel-atmos
>>   origin/camel-gora
>>   origin/camel-ignite
>>   origin/cxf3
>>   origin/cxf_wrong_content_length
>>   origin/feature/camel-hystrix
>>   origin/feature/camel-xmljson-legal-license-compliance
>>   origin/fix-8478
>>   origin/fix/CAMEL-8689-camel-dozer-classloading-issue
>>   origin/jdk8-lambdas
>>   origin/jsonpath_encoding
>>   origin/osgi-trouble
>>   origin/temp-jetty9
>>   origin/temp-jetty9-2
>>
>>
>> And what is this branch used for?
>>
>>   origin/master-dev
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2




-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2

Reply via email to