+1, I'd rather use some form of a facade (homegrown, slf4j, etc.)

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:55 AM Vitalii Tymchyshyn <v...@tym.im> wrote:

> Well, best practice is to use a logging facade like slf4j and not some
> logging implementation, like logback or log4j.
>
> P.S. I will be grateful if someone tell me if this message can be seen
>
> Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn
>
> Вт, 2 серп. 2016 08:53 користувач Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> пише:
>
> > Oh and if any migration is needed, then maybe logback is an
> > alternative than log4j v2?
> > http://logback.qos.ch
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j
> > 2 ?
> > >>
> > >
> > > We only use it for testing. No runtime dependency.
> > >
> > >
> > > log4j v2 did not support log4j.properties file so any migration was a
> > > real pain as the log4j xml file format is verbose and clunky to work
> > > with.
> > >
> > > Only recently they added support for .properties file but I think they
> > > may have changed the syntax slightly (not sure).
> > >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22485074/log4j-2-doesnt-support-log4j-properties-file-anymore
> > >
> > >
> > > And I think I read somewhere that log4j v1 has problems with Java 9.
> > >
> > > If migration can be super easy on current 2.18 then it is okay.
> > > Some kind of migration tool that can covert v1 properties to v2
> > > properties then that can be doable.
> > >
> > > But if not then I would like to postpone this to Camel 3.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >> Luca Burgazzoli
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Claus Ibsen
> > > -----------------
> > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Claus Ibsen
> > -----------------
> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> >
>

Reply via email to