Hi

Well spotted, yeah the spring-boot-dm BOM should also be generated correctly.
It looks as if the JARs from camel-core are removed.

The karaf commands is ofcourse not needed and can be removed as it was
in the PR.


On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:51 AM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we have to review this
> https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/ffbe4efdc9e065b076a3952631facae46a1e25f3
>
> Rebuilding the whole project generate a different spring-boot-dm
>
> https://gist.github.com/oscerd/3eebfd1cec22af66f1d34cb44d70fedd
>
> With this stuff in, all the Spring Boot integration tests fail
>
> Il giorno gio 4 lug 2019 alle ore 09:47 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
> ha scritto:
>
> > +1 for a M4
> >
> > Le jeu. 4 juil. 2019 à 06:48, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a écrit
> > :
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I think we should close down on the last bits and get milestone 4
> > > released and in the hands to the community.
> > >
> > > We had a number of significant improvements and features such as:
> > >
> > > 1) Endpoint DSL
> > > Type safe fluent builder for configuring endpoints in Java
> > >
> > > 2) Camel Main
> > > Standalone Camel for microservices
> > > Needed for Camel K and Camel Quarkus as the way to bootstrap Camel
> > >
> > > 3) camel-core-engine
> > > Tiny set of dependencies (only include absolutely what you need)
> > > Needed by Camel K and Camel Quarkus to have smaller set of JARs on
> > > classpath
> > >
> > > 4) components depend on camel-support
> > > Further reduced the dependency directly on camel-core for all set of
> > > components. To ensure we use camel-api/camel-support for components
> > > only.
> > >
> > > 5) lazy start producer
> > > You can configure in the endpoint that the producer should lazy start
> > > (eg on 1st message) you can use this to allow Camel to startup even if
> > > the producer would fail on startup - but now that failure is deferred
> > > to 1st message which you can then use Camels route error handler to
> > > deal with etc
> > >
> > > 6) SPI for Reactive Engine
> > > So we can plugin a different engine such as Camel Quarkus can benefit
> > > from using its reactive engine.
> > >
> > > 7) DSL more extensive
> > > The reifiers and DSL model is more extensive/expandable. For example a
> > > new yaml dsl flow is developed at Camel K that required some of these
> > > changes.
> > >
> > > 8) Properties component / placeholder
> > > We can now easier extend this and also plugin to more 3rd parties such
> > > as Eclipse MicroProfile Config (which is also needed by Camel Quarkus)
> > >
> > > 9) Usual stuff
> > > Like bug fixes and whatnot.
> > >
> > >
> > > I am currently working on getting the property component and
> > > placeholder refactored so it works better and can easier to integrated
> > > with other configuration libraries. Also it would allow us to
> > > differentiate between read-only placeholders that can be loaded at
> > > once, and others that are on-demand (eg to lookup in a database,
> > > hashicorp vault etc.)
> > >
> > > Also the CI build server is now 100% passing for the last couple of days.
> > >
> > > So lets see if we can get the last bits done by end of tomorrow or end
> > > of next week, and get a RC cut.
> > >
> > > And we also need a M4 for both Camel K and Camel Quarkus to upgrade and
> > > use.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Claus Ibsen
> > > -----------------
> > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2

Reply via email to