lburgazzoli commented on issue #42: Use RestAssured in JDBC test URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/42#issuecomment-509574993 > I see at least two reasons why we might not want to do this: > > 1. Practical: adding resteasy bloats the native image a bit. Compilation will take more time and memory. > It does but I won't sacrifice better testing for some cpu cyle > 2. Methodology: Having resteasy in all itests might cause us miss potential issues in setups without resteasy (because we will never test them). In other words, I think it is good to have itests with non-overlapping dependency sets because in that way, we will cover more mutually independent execution paths. **No one is saying that we should ban tests that do not use resteasy** but if you look at my PR you can clearly see that the using rest assured + resteasy make the test much easier to write and understand.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
