On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:23 PM Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for camel-test-junit5 as it clearly indicate what it the testing > framework using under the hoods >
Yeah that is a good name too, as junit is short name . > --- > Luca Burgazzoli > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:13 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Feedback are welcome. > > > > Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 17:11 Alex Dettinger < > > aldettin...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > Let me summarize the current options that have been evoked so far: > > > camel-test-jupiter > > > camel-test-junit-jupiter > > > camel-test-junit5 > > > camel-test5 > > > > > > What do you think ? > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:08 PM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > I've started the development of a new module adding the possibility > > to > > > > write base camel-test with JUnit5. So far, I've named the module > > > > camel-test-junit5, which would lead to a family of name like > > > > camel-test-junit5-spring, camel-test-junit5-spring-boot... > > > > > > > > I would like to trigger a discussion around the naming of this module > > > as > > > > other candidate are also valid. For instance: > > > > camel-test-jupiter > > > > camel-test-junit-jupiter > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/3084 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-13826 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2