On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:23 PM Luca Burgazzoli <lburgazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  +1 for camel-test-junit5 as it clearly indicate what it the testing
> framework using under the hoods
>

Yeah that is a good name too, as junit is short name .


> ---
> Luca Burgazzoli
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:13 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Feedback are welcome.
> >
> > Il giorno mar 6 ago 2019 alle ore 17:11 Alex Dettinger <
> > aldettin...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > > Let me summarize the current options that have been evoked so far:
> > > camel-test-jupiter
> > > camel-test-junit-jupiter
> > > camel-test-junit5
> > > camel-test5
> > >
> > > What do you think ?
> > > Alex
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:08 PM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > >   I've started the development of a new module adding the possibility
> > to
> > > > write base camel-test with JUnit5. So far, I've named the module
> > > > camel-test-junit5, which would lead to a family of name like
> > > > camel-test-junit5-spring, camel-test-junit5-spring-boot...
> > > >
> > > >   I would like to trigger a discussion around the naming of this module
> > > as
> > > > other candidate are also valid. For instance:
> > > >   camel-test-jupiter
> > > >  camel-test-junit-jupiter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/3084
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-13826
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2

Reply via email to