Hi, I agree, it makes sense to me. I think that more than fast, we should have a "regular pace" in term of releases (even if the releases don’t contain much).
Regards JB > Le 28 févr. 2020 à 07:39, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hi > > We have released Camel 3.0 and 3.1 yesterday. As Camel v3 is a major > new foundation with all the effort that went into it, then we want to > take the new few releases to continue as there are things we need to > work on. > > Therefore we want to have a more aggressive release schedule and > release more frequent releases but they are not LTS releases (long > term support). Therefore these releases likely only have 1 patch > releases, eg 3.0.1, or none at all. > > When we hit Camel 3.3 then its expected to be a LTS release and have > patch releases for a longer period of time. > > And in fact this model is maybe something we want to continue > thereafter and be able to mark releases as LTS and non LTS. Eg just > like the JDK etc. > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
