I don't think it is feasible. Nobody would do it. It's time consuming.

Il gio 8 ott 2020, 09:21 Djordje Bajić <djole.ba...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Hello Andrea, Jan,
>
> In that case, maybe PR reviewers can run tests locally on that branch and
> check? What do you guys think?
>
> - Djordje
>
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, 08:09 Andrea Cosentino, <anco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > No, incremental build are not supported. The Camel build is too complex
> for
> > that.
> >
> > Il giorno gio 8 ott 2020 alle ore 08:07 Djordje Bajić <
> > djole.ba...@gmail.com>
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hi Jan!
> > >
> > > Yes i understand that tests are gonna last long. Idk if there is
> > > possibility to specify to run only tests for that particular component
> or
> > > project inside the camel?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 21:09 Jan Bednář, <m...@janbednar.eu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > It would be great IMO, but I think you need to actually run the tests
> > > > for coverage report. We currently skip tests for github PR, because
> it
> > > > takes many hours to test whole codebase - these are running during
> > > > nightly build.
> > > >
> > > > Dne 7.10.2020 v 15:08 Djordje Bajić napsal(a):
> > > > > Hello fellow Cameleers!
> > > > >
> > > > > I am looking into twitter component, doing some small refactoring.
> I
> > > > > noticed something interesting, code coverage is a little above 50%,
> > in
> > > my
> > > > > opinion that is a really poor %. What do you think that we add some
> > > > checks
> > > > > or  when doing PR reviews to also check coverage of added code?
> This
> > > way
> > > > we
> > > > > will promote that tests  are mandatory in order to  approve PR. Of
> > > course
> > > > > there will be some cases when tests are not available to be
> written,
> > > > anyway
> > > > > i think this will help us reduce the number of bugs and give us
> > freedom
> > > > to
> > > > > add, change and refactor with more confidence.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to