+1, thanks for tackling this.

Regards
JB

> Le 13 avr. 2021 à 10:28, Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Yeah, i was considering them as part of the camel point. But yeah. I'll
> open the infra issue soon, probably end of the week.
> 
> Il mar 13 apr 2021, 10:24 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
>> I did not see SB / karaf on that list, and we can expand the 3
>> examples, so the list should be added with
>> 
>> camel-spring-boot
>> camel-karaf
>> camel-examples
>> camel-spring-boot-examples
>> camel-karaf-examples
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:32 AM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> camel-kamelets was missing from the list
>>> 
>>> camel
>>> camel-example (x 3)
>>> camel-k
>>> camel-k-examples
>>> camel-k-runtime
>>> camel-kafka-connector
>>> camel-kafka-connector-examples
>>> camel-performance-tests
>>> camel-kamelets
>>> 
>>> Other comments?
>>> 
>>> Il giorno gio 8 apr 2021 alle ore 14:20 Andrea Cosentino <
>> anco...@gmail.com>
>>> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I think we need some coordination in the renaming of master branches to
>>>> main in all of our repositories.
>>>> 
>>>> I think we need to come up to INFRA with a list of repos we want to
>> move
>>>> to main.
>>>> 
>>>> Then we need to check every reference in Jenkins or gh actions and
>> align.
>>>> 
>>>> It doesn't really make sense to rename just a couple of repositories in
>>>> subprojects of the ecosystem.
>>>> 
>>>> So I think we need to list what repositories are now missing.
>>>> 
>>>> We have:
>>>> camel-quarkus done
>>>> camel-website done
>>>> 
>>>> We are missing:
>>>> camel
>>>> camel-example (x 3)
>>>> camel-k
>>>> camel-k-examples
>>>> camel-k-runtime
>>>> camel-kafka-connector
>>>> camel-kafka-connector-examples
>>>> camel-performance-tests
>>>> 
>>>> probably more. I need to complete the list.
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>> 

Reply via email to