We do not need any docs, its not for development its for users that can patch camel-quarkus in production
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 7:43 PM David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What’s going to happen about docs? There are no 2.2.x docs at the moment…. I > assumed 2.2.x was obsolete and unsupported. Given the length of time they > have been missing, making them work will take some effort. > > David Jencks > > > On Jan 13, 2022, at 3:46 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:32 AM Peter Palaga <ppal...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> this is a heads up that we are preparing the release of Camel Quarkus > >> 2.2.1 these days. > >> > >> The main motivation was to fix the recent Log4j vulnerabilities in the > >> Camel Quarkus branch based on Camel 3.14 LTS. Backporting those fixes, > >> we told ourselves to backport a bit more fixes to have a proper 2.2.1 > >> LTS release. > >> > >> This is the current state: > >> https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/commits/2.2.x > >> This PR is also targeted at 2.2.x: > >> https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/3456 > >> > >> Please feel free to raise your hand if you see some important fix to be > >> missing in 2.2.x. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -- Peter > >> > > > > +1 to get a LTS release for camel-quarkus > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
