Thanks Claus, I open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20181 for
tracking

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:37 AM Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> It should support both, and it may be that the code need to check for 3.0
> vs 3.1 in that [2]. I assume there is a Json30 and Json31 for each version
> of the spec.
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 12:55 PM Zheng Feng <zf...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was working on CAMEL-20156
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20156> and camel-quarkus
> > issue
> > #5559 <https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/5559>. I found
> that
> > all of our tests are against the OpenAPI 3.0 result by using
> > "io.swagger.v3.core.util.Json.pretty(openApi3)" , see [1]. But the
> response
> > of the api endpoint is rendered with 3.1 by using
> > "io.swagger.v3.core.util.Json31.pretty(openApi)", see [2].
> >
> > Then I'm confused about what version of OpenAPI we support now. Both 3.0
> > and 3.1? our tests should be updated?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zheng Feng
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/main/components/camel-openapi-java/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/openapi/RestOpenApiSupport.java#L377
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/main/components/camel-openapi-java/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/openapi/RestOpenApiSupport.java#L330
> >
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> @davsclaus
> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>

Reply via email to