Thanks,

I tried w/ 4.7.0-SNAPSHOT and it seems to happen with it too.

I can't dig into that right now this week, but I'll try to keep this one on
the back of my mind so I try to take a look at it as soon as I can (in case
no one picks it before me).

Kind regards

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 12:27 AM Arthur Naseef <artnas...@apache.org> wrote:

> Jira issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-20835
>
> Added tests, finished wiring the reifer for multicast, and updated
> constructors for multicast, splitter, and recipientlist.
>
> Thoughts?  Given that the impact is an OOM condition with no known
> workaround outside of changing the route definition to no longer use
> multicast with dynamic URLs, I hope this can get addressed promptly.
>
> Note that I did not test XML parsing.  Some of the code generation during
> the maven build - that modifies committed files - is confusing, so
> definitely could use some input on the correct way to manage/update some of
> those files.  Note that I can be reached on ASF slack - in the Camel
> channel, or via DM.
>
> Art
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:41 AM Arthur Naseef <artnas...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Here is a commit on my personal fork of the camel github repo that adds a
> > setting to disable that cache.  I tested it with the reproducer and it
> > appears to be working well:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/camel/compare/main...artnaseef:camel:asn/disable-error-handler-cache-setting
> >
> >
> > Art
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 12:46 PM Arthur Naseef <artnas...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Out Of Memory (OOM) occurs when using the Recipient List with a large
> >> number of dynamic URLs.  For example:
> >>
> >>     .recipientList(simple("http://
> >> {{downstream-server}}/employee/${header.emplId}"))
> >>
> >> with a large number of values for ${header.emplId} leads to the OOM.
> >>
> >> REPRODUCER:
> >> =============
> >> https://github.com/artnaseef/camel-recipient-list-oom-reproducer
> >>
> >> - See the README.md for instructions to reproduce and detect the problem
> >>
> >> DETAILS
> >> =======
> >>  The MulticastProcessor, which RecipientListProcessor extends, has the
> >> following "unlimited" cache:
> >>
> >>     private final ConcurrentMap<Processor, Processor> errorHandlers =
> >> new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
> >>
> >> Entries are added to this map for every unique processor created - every
> >> unique URL generates a unique processor.  The entries themselves are
> >> wrapped processor instances for error handling IIUC (to support the
> custom
> >> error handling used by multicast and recipient-list).  Entries are only
> >> removed from this map on shutdown.  Ironically, there is an LRUCache for
> >> the processors themselves, with a default maximum size of 1000, so the
> >> wrapped processors may get recreated even though the error handler
> remains
> >> in the map indefinitely.
> >>
> >> IMPACT VERSIONS:
> >> ================
> >> Appears to impact versions >= 3.10.0
> >>
> >> COMMIT: 0d9227ff16fb00e047fdd087740c87cce01bb545
> >> =======
> >> It appears this commit introduced the use of the errorHandlers
> >> "unlimited" cache for recipient lists.
> >>
> >> FOLLOW-UP
> >> ==========
> >> I have ideas and questions for implemeting a fix:
> >>     - IDEA 1: We can use an LRUCache for this data structure as well.
> >>     - Does it make more sense to remove the entries from errorHandlers
> >> when the related Processor entry is removed from it's LRUCache?
> >>     - IDEA 2: setting on recipient list to disable the errorHandler
> cache
> >> (for dyamic urls with little chance of duplicates, this could be the
> best)
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Otavio R. Piske
http://orpiske.net

Reply via email to