On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - signature and checksum are good > - I'm not able to build from source distribution: > > CamelArtifact.java:[77,49] package ImmutableCamelArtifact does not exist > CamelCapability.java:[68,51] package ImmutableCamelCapability does not > exist > ... > > Thanks, I will have a look at this. > - Good to be fixed (not release blocker): some files don't include ASF > header, it would be great to add it (including on doc resources). I > will create a PR about that. > Cool, thanks a lot. > - Nit: as mentioned in another thread, releases may not be vetoed > (https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes). I would > rephrase the cast vote section. > > Okey, I just used some old voting thread. I'll change that in the future releases. > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 10:57 PM Pasquale Congiusti > <pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > This is a vote to release Camel K Runtime 3.15.2 (LTS). This release will > > provide the runtime for Camel Quarkus 3.15.2 (based on Camel 4.8.3). > > > > Camel K Runtime source files: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/camel/camel-k-runtime/3.15.2/ > > > > Camel K Runtime staging repository: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1789 > > > > Camel K Runtime Tag: > > > https://github.com/apache/camel-k-runtime/releases/tag/camel-k-runtime-project-3.15.2 > > > > It's possible test the staging artifacts by setting the staging > repository > > in your Maven configuration and run any Integration with the new runtime: > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > kamel run Test.java -t camel.runtime-version=3.15.2 > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Please test these release candidates and cast your vote. > > > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Camel K Runtime 3.15.2 > > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > > > I start the vote with my +1. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Pasquale Congiusti >
