Absolutely, that's what I meant. Don't blindly trust them.

Il giorno mar 5 ago 2025 alle ore 12:01 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
ha scritto:

> Can that be solved by asking for PR reviews ?
>
> Le mar. 5 août 2025 à 11:37, Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
>
> > I think it's a good idea, my only concern is giving too much trust to AI
> > agents.
> >
> > They still need to be supervised.
> >
> > Il giorno mar 5 ago 2025 alle ore 10:40 Otavio Rodolfo Piske <
> > angusyo...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to bring to discussion that we add a set of a dedicated AI
> > > instructions file (e.g., INSTRUCTIONS.ai) to the Apache Camel
> repository
> > > (core and other sub-projects).
> > >
> > > The purpose of these files would be to define how AI-powered coding
> > agents
> > > and tools should behave when generating code for this project. I
> believe
> > > this would be beneficial for a few key reasons:
> > >
> > >    1.
> > >
> > >    *Enforce ASF Generative Tooling Guidelines:* It would help us
> formally
> > >    adopt and point to the standards defined by the ASF on the use of
> > >    generative AI, ensuring all contributions are compliant.
> > >    -
> > >
> > >       Apache Software Foundation Legal - Generative Tooling
> > >       <https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html>
> > >       2.
> > >
> > >    *Maintain Project Coding Standards:* We can use it to instruct AI
> > tools
> > >    on Camel's specific coding patterns, conventions, and architectural
> > >    principles. This will help maintain the consistency and quality of
> the
> > >    codebase.
> > >    3.
> > >
> > >    *Define Clear Guardrails:* It allows us to establish a reasonable
> set
> > of
> > >    rules and constraints for generated code, promoting security,
> > > reliability,
> > >    and adherence to best practices from the start.
> > >
> > > This is becoming a standard practice in other major open-source
> projects.
> > > For example, the Linux kernel community is already discussing and
> > defining
> > > similar guidelines to ensure AI-assisted contributions are
> constructive.
> > >
> > >    -
> > >
> > >    Linux Kernel Mailing List Discussion
> > >    <
> > >
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725175358.1989323-1-sas...@kernel.org/>
> > >
> > > I believe that taking this proactive step will help us harness the
> > benefits
> > > of AI tooling while safeguarding the integrity of the project.
> > >
> > > I'd like to open a discussion on this. What are your thoughts? Any
> other
> > > projects in the ASF that have defined these instructions and that we
> > could
> > > inspire our guidelines on?
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > --
> > > Otavio R. Piske
> > > http://orpiske.net
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
>

Reply via email to