Hi, I agree with Ravi, first we need to come up with solution how to store till nano/mico second in carbon. Then changing the formatter will be useful for us.
Regards Kumar Vishal On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 6:18 PM, Ravindra Pesala <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think it is bigger than just changing to DateTimeFormatter. As of now, > carbon uses only 64 bit to store timestamp so it can accommodate till > milliseconds. In order to support till nanoseconds, we need to use 96 > bits. If you check spark-parquet it uses 96 bits to store timestamp. It > would be good if we also go in that direction to support till nanosecond > level. Thank you. > > Regards, > Ravindra. > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 14:50, Zhangshunyu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > ----- > > My English name is Sunday > > -- > > Sent from: > > http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/ > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Ravi >
