Joseph: Is it somehow similar to Twisted? am I wrong?
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Joseph Bowman <bowman.jos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well Tornado is light weight, it is it's own web server as well, so no need > to run something like apache in front of it, and is a nice light framework. > It's an eventd style process, so supports lots of connections very well, > which would give you more flexibility is designing clients to work with it. > > http://www.tornadoweb.org/ > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Pablo Cuadrado > <pablocuadr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Gabriele: >> >> Yes, the idea is to make it light-weighted. However, I may add: it >> would be nice (for us all) to use a framework which the community >> feels comfortable with. >> >> I'm trying to find a balance between features and footprint, having a >> small footprint is very important, but also, we want something >> scalable for adding features on next versions of the UI. >> >> Sessions, IMHO, are useful in many ways on web interfaces, for >> example, in user authentication (which the UI should have), >> preferences, etc. >> >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:42 PM, gabriele renzi <rff....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Pablo Cuadrado <pablocuadr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> - Really small footprint is a plus: "do we really need to include >> >> that, and that, and that other thing?" >> > >> > as I can imagine your app won't have any state per se, so you don't >> > have any DB issues, you probably won't even need sessions, why not use >> > simpler environments? I loved CherryPy some years ago, and there are >> > plenty of new microframeworks such as Bottle which seem more fitting >> > to _this_ bullet point than django and pylons. >> > >> >
