On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 September 2011 18:34, Vivek Mishra <vivek.mis...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Sounds good moving to github. >> 1 quick question, what about JIRAs already raised w.r.t drivers? Not sure >> but is it possible to integrate these new projects with current JIRA flow? >> >> Planning to make these new projects based on maven build process?(As that >> might be helpful in case of any quick release required for any sub module). > > Ha! > > I would be genuinely surprised if that were to happen. > > I think there is a greater chance of seeing C* itself being built with > maven than the drivers...
Really? I see the exact opposite, (and it's probably no secret how I feel about Maven). > P.S. > I will wait to be asked for my opinion on how this could be addresses > using Maven as a build tool. Is that, "Through the use of copious amounts of XML markup, storage, and network bandwidth?". :) Sorry, I couldn't resist. > The stated preference of the C* > developers is to use ANT. I am happy that Maven ANT Tasks is being > used over IVY, and happy that the artifacts are being pushed to > central, after that it doesn't matter what the build tool used is, as > long as the published poms are good (and last time I fine tuned them > they were) and as long as stuff gets into central, I am fine. -- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
