I can't seem to divine from the code what count is being used for. Is it describing the number of elements that are being accessed? Is it the third dimension on the columns being accessed?
On another note, and I asked something about this earlier, but I may have been using the wrong terminology: Is there a preferred way to store these pairs of start and end columns? A list? A sorted set? should the elements be stored in pairs? or just assumed to be put into the list/set in pairs? Mark On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the sense that you have a collection of columns to select from the > given row, yes, this is pretty straightforward. The only real wrinkle > is, it's clear that you need pairs of start + end columns to select, > but what about count? Should there be a sub-count per slice, or one > master count for the entire filter? > > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Mark Dewey <milde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I realize multiple people may be working on this, so maybe some > discussion > > would help? > > > > CASSANDRA-3885 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3885> > > > > Should we just copy the way this is handled in NamesQueryFilter? Or am I > > missing something obvious? > > > > Mark > > > > -- > Jonathan Ellis > Project Chair, Apache Cassandra > co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support > http://www.datastax.com >
