+1

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>wrote:

> So, seems like CASSANDRA-6924 was kind of a false alarm. And since I've
> never dropped
> the artifacts and no commit has been done on 1.2 since then, I propose to
> just resurrect the
> vote. Since the vote had initially ran for 2 days, I'm going to propose
> that we only extend for
> just 24h more hours (provided we get enough +1 by then). Please do re-vote
> however.
>
> --
> Sylvain
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Alright, let's figure out what's going on there and we'll restart a new
> > vote from there.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Tyler Hobbs <ty...@datastax.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6924 to
> >> investigate.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tyler Hobbs <ty...@datastax.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > After digging a bit, the regression is that data inserted immediately
> >> > after secondary index creation may never get indexed.
> >> >
> >> > The operation order goes like this:
> >> > 1) create CF
> >> > 2) create secondary index
> >> > 3) insert data
> >> > 4) query secondary index
> >> >
> >> > If I add a short sleep in between steps 2 and 3, the data gets indexed
> >> and
> >> > the query is successful.
> >> >
> >> > If I only add a sleep in between steps 3 and 4, some of the data is
> >> never
> >> > indexed and the query will return incomplete results.  This appears to
> >> be
> >> > the case even if the sleep is relatively long (30s), which makes me
> >> think
> >> > the data may never get indexed.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Tyler Hobbs <ty...@datastax.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -1
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm seeing a regression from 1.2.15 on secondary index queries
> (through
> >> >> Thrift) with a LongType key validator.  Specifically, this test in
> >> pycassa
> >> >> is failing against 1.2.16-tentative:
> >> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/pycassa/pycassa/blob/master/tests/test_autopacking.py#L793
> >> >>
> >> >> I haven't looked into the issue deeply yet to see what's going on.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Sylvain Lebresne <
> >> sylv...@datastax.com>wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.16.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> sha1: 05fcfa2be4eba2cd6daeee62d943f48c45f42668
> >> >>> Git:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.2.16-tentative
> >> >>> Artifacts:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1008/org/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/1.2.16/
> >> >>> Staging repository:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1008/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here:
> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~slebresne/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [1]: http://goo.gl/Cgiimu (CHANGES.txt)
> >> >>> [2]: http://goo.gl/gvKkBm (NEWS.txt)
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Tyler Hobbs
> >> >> DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Tyler Hobbs
> >> > DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tyler Hobbs
> >> DataStax <http://datastax.com/>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to