Overall +1.

I'm -0 on EOL of 2.0 once 2.2 is release. I'd rather keep 2.0 around
till 3.0 comes out.

As for 2.2 blockers, we might want to vet and make sure everything we
need in protocol v4 is finished before we release 2.2
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8043


On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *With 8099 still weeks from being code complete, and even longer from being
> stable, I’m starting to think we should decouple everything that’s already
> done in trunk from 8099.  That is, ship 2.2 ASAP with - Windows support-
> UDF- Role-based permissions - JSON- Compressed commitlog- Off-heap row
> cache- Message coalescing on by default- Native protocol v4and let 3.0 ship
> with 8099 and a few things that finish by then (vnode compaction,
> file-based hints, maybe materialized views).Remember that we had 7 release
> candidates for 2.1.  Splitting 2.2 and 3.0 up this way will reduce the risk
> in both 2.2 and 3.0 by separating most of the new features from the big
> engine change.  We might still have a lot of stabilization to do for either
> or both, but at the least this lets us get a head start on testing the new
> features in 2.2.This does introduce a new complication, which is that
> instead of 3.0 being an unusually long time after 2.1, it will be an
> unusually short time after 2.2.  The “default” if we follow established
> practice would be to*
>
>    -
>
>    EOL 2.1 when 3.0 ships, and maintain 2.2.x and 3.0.x stabilization
>    branches
>
>
> *But, this is probably not the best investment we could make for our users
> since 2.2 and 3.0 are relatively close in functionality.  I see a couple
> other options without jumping to 3 concurrent stabilization series:*
>
>
>
> * - Extend 2.1.x series and 2.2.x until 4.0, but skip 3.0.x stabilization
> series in favor of tick-tock 3.x- Extend 2.1.x series until 4.0, but stop
> 2.2.x when 3.0 ships in favor of developing 3.0.x insteadThoughts?*
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
> @spyced



-- 
http://twitter.com/tjake

Reply via email to