On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:07 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM Nate McCall <n...@thelastpickle.com> wrote: > > > Whereas the health of my company and title rely heavily on a thriving open > > source community, yet Aleksey and I are in agreement. Let's keep it up at > > the level of the project and technical merits, please. > > > > > Okay, that might have been a bit of a low-blow, and I apologize. But, > we've seen this sort of thing happen around the organization. We need to > make sure that things stay "fair" for everyone and that outside influences > don't unduly drive the project.
I understand and I have been equally frustrated by other projects recently. At the end of the day, I do appreciate the effort in looking into this. I'm going to re-iterate and call it a day: - I dont feel like there is an issue with the current driver being separate - There are some technical and project direction reasons whey it's good idea to keep it out of the PMC's purview Cheers, -Nate
